Discussion:
Legal fees?
(too old to reply)
peps...@gmail.com
2024-01-17 18:43:57 UTC
Permalink
XG doubled me in the below position.
Obviously this is an easy take, and I didn't actually believe the double.
So I took Xavier to court, and showed the rollout to the presiding judge.

Who won the court case?

Paul

XGID=-B--a-E-Ca--cBAa-bbe---AA-:0:0:-1:00:3:0:0:11:10
X:XG Roller+ O:Daniel

Score is X:0 O:3 11 pt.(s) match.
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X X O | | O X O |
| X O | | O O |
| X O | | O |
| | | O |
| | | O |
| |BAR| |
| | | X |
| | | X |
| | | X |
| O X X | | X |
| O O X X X | | X O O |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 146 O: 143 X-O: 0-3/11
Cube: 1
X on roll, cube action
Timothy Chow
2024-01-18 13:28:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@gmail.com
XG doubled me in the below position.
Obviously this is an easy take, and I didn't actually believe the double.
So I took Xavier to court, and showed the rollout to the presiding judge.
Who won the court case?
Paul
XGID=-B--a-E-Ca--cBAa-bbe---AA-:0:0:-1:00:3:0:0:11:10
X:XG Roller+ O:Daniel
Score is X:0 O:3 11 pt.(s) match.
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X X O | | O X O |
| X O | | O O |
| X O | | O |
| | | O |
| | | O |
| |BAR| |
| | | X |
| | | X |
| | | X |
| O X X | | X |
| O O X X X | | X O O |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 146 O: 143 X-O: 0-3/11
Cube: 1
X on roll, cube action
I don't think I would double here, although I can believe that XG would
say that it's a borderline double because of the match score.

---
Tim Chow
peps...@gmail.com
2024-01-20 10:41:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Timothy Chow
Post by ***@gmail.com
XG doubled me in the below position.
Obviously this is an easy take, and I didn't actually believe the double.
So I took Xavier to court, and showed the rollout to the presiding judge.
Who won the court case?
Paul
XGID=-B--a-E-Ca--cBAa-bbe---AA-:0:0:-1:00:3:0:0:11:10
X:XG Roller+ O:Daniel
Score is X:0 O:3 11 pt.(s) match.
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X X O | | O X O |
| X O | | O O |
| X O | | O |
| | | O |
| | | O |
| |BAR| |
| | | X |
| | | X |
| | | X |
| O X X | | X |
| O O X X X | | X O O |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 146 O: 143 X-O: 0-3/11
Cube: 1
X on roll, cube action
I don't think I would double here, although I can believe that XG would
say that it's a borderline double because of the match score.
It is indeed a marginal double. (See below). The main reason I expected
the hold was that I didn't realise how good XG's position was.
If I knew that XG's equity was above 0.65, I wouldn't have been surprised
because there is a fair amount of volatility.

Paul

Analyzed in Rollout
No double
Player Winning Chances: 65.92% (G:17.87% B:1.01%)
Opponent Winning Chances: 34.08% (G:10.85% B:0.39%)
Double/Take
Player Winning Chances: 66.26% (G:17.86% B:1.00%)
Opponent Winning Chances: 33.74% (G:10.65% B:0.35%)

Cubeless Equities: No Double=+0.389, Double=+0.832

Cubeful Equities:
No double: +0.662 (-0.020)
Double/Take: +0.682
Double/Pass: +1.000 (+0.318)

Best Cube action: Double / Take

Rollout:
1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
Confidence No Double: ± 0.012 (+0.649..+0.674)
Confidence Double: ± 0.017 (+0.665..+0.698)

Double Decision confidence: 97.1%
Take Decision confidence: 100.0%

Duration: 6 minutes 56 seconds

eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10, MET: Kazaross XG2

Loading...